Convolvulus angustissimus


Four subspecies are recognised and can be distinguished as follows.
1. Lower cauline Leaves broad and much divided with the terminal lobe more than 1.5 mm wide; lobes gradually becoming narrower towards the tip…………………………………. C. angustissimus subsp. angustissimus
Cauline Leaves with narrow lobes almost from the base of the plant; lobes < 1.5 mm wide, or if wider then basal lobes spreading and clavate and terminal lobe distinctly obovate-clavate.................... 2
2. Flowers 14-25 mm long; flowering pedicels 8-18 mm long; outer sepals moderately to sparsely hairy, usually ciliate at the tip; Seeds with sparse low reticulate ridges.........................................................
................................................................................... . C. angustissimus subsp. omnigracilis
Flowers 9-14 mm long; flowering pedicels 4-8 mm long....................................................... 3
- 3. Seeds smooth; sepals ± glabrous to sparsely hairy, with hairs mainly appressed, Leaves with ascending lobes often > 1/3 the length of the terminal lobe and lacking distinctive basal lobes………………………………………..…… C. angustissimus subsp. fililobus
Seeds with sparse low reticulate ridges; sepals moderately to sparsely hairy with ascending and spreading hairs common; Leaves with ascending lobes mostly < 1/3 the length of the terminal lobe; lower cauline Leaves with distinct, spreading, clavate basal lobes.....................................................................................
................................................................................ . C. angustissimus subsp. peninsularum
Both C. angustissimus subsp. omnigracilis and C. angustissimus subsp. fililobus are reasonably distinctive but much variation is present within C. angustissimus subsp. angustissimus and C. angustissimus subsp. peninsularum. Because of the great variation, resulting from ontogenetic development and geographic distribution, and the influence of time of germination and length of the growing season on morphology, it is difficult to classify the existing variation on the basis of herbarium specimens. In addition, hybridisation further confounds attempts at classification. More field work will be necessary to clarify the variation which exists within these taxa.
C. angustissimus most closely
resembles C. wimmerensis. C. recurvatus
has similar recurved pedicels subtending mature Capsules but its pedicels are much shorter than those in C. angustissimus,
its Flowers smaller and its inflorescences
often compound.
Convolvulus angustissimus R. Br., Prod. 482 (1810). Type: Tasmania, Van Diemens Land near Risdon Cove, in 1804, R. Brown (holotype BM [Bennett 2765]; isotypes MEL [MEL689920], MEL [MEL689582]).
Johnson, R.W. 2001. A taxonomic revision of Convolvulus L. (Convolvulaceae) in Australia. Austrobaileya 6: 1–39.
Convolvulus erubescens var. angustissimus (R.Br.) Choisy in DC., Prod. 9: 412 (1845).
Convolvulus erubescens var. albus Guilfoyle, Australian Plants: 117 (1911). Type: “Vic.” (holotype not found).
? Convolvulus geniculatus Lehm., Semina in horto botanico Hamburgense 1826 collecta quae pro mutua commutatione offeruntur (1826). Type: none cited.
Though this species was described in 1853, the name has rarely appeared in print. Strangely, Bentham (1869) did not take account of the name and appeared unaware of its publication. Under C. erubescens Sims he remarked on a remarkable form or variety “¼.. with the Leaves very densely tomentose and much-cut and crisped and the peduncles very short from Cudnaka” which had been collected by Mueller. This specimen had been selected by Mueller as the type for the name of his species, C. crispifolius. Mueller (1864) wrote of the extreme variation existing within C. erubescens and reduced C. crispifolias (now spelt as C. crispifolius) to synonomy under C. erubescens. I was not aware of its existence until after C. eyreanus was described.